AI infrastructure and strategy
Q: Michael Cyprys from Morgan Stanley asked how sensitive the AI financing build-out is to higher interest rates and how the firm protects capital from lower-than-expected returns.
A: Jonathan Gray explained that the firm focuses on providing compute through long-term contracts of 15 to 20 years with highly creditworthy counterparties, which provides a disciplined approach to deployment.
Q: Alexander Blostein from Goldman Sachs asked how wider credit spreads impact valuations and how the firm frames the fundraising opportunity to fill gaps left by constrained public markets.
A: Jonathan Gray stated that valuation impacts are minor and higher yields on new assets may be beneficial, adding that the scarcity of compute makes their entitled, powered sites more valuable.
Q: Christoph Kotowski from Oppenheimer asked about the firm's role as a matchmaker between capital needs and sources, and whether the opportunity lies in investment-grade drawdown funds or other structures.
A: Jonathan Gray and Steve Schwarzman described an all of the above strategy, noting they provide holistic solutions across debt and equity, while maintaining a disciplined focus on senior, contracted assets.
Q: Glenn Schorr from Evercore asked how the firm balances technological obsolescence and concentration limits when going all in on AI.
A: Jonathan Gray noted that the vast majority of their 7% exposure to AI infrastructure is in data centers with long-term leases and investment-grade counterparties, which mitigates risk.
Q: Benjamin Budish from Barclays Capital asked how insurance LPs are thinking about concentration in AI-related debt.
A: Jonathan Gray said insurance clients are mindful of exposure but are increasingly viewing asset-backed financing as an attractive trade compared to liquid corporate bonds, and the market will likely broaden over time.
Private wealth and retail distribution
Q: Bart Dziarski from RBC Capital Markets asked about the drivers of private wealth fundraising momentum and the outlook for the new BXPM product.
A: Jonathan Gray attributed the momentum to strong investment performance and the firm's brand, noting that BXPM is in early stages and will require market education.
Q: Devin Ryan from Citizens Bank asked about the Vanguard and Wellington partnerships and whether they represent incremental growth or cannibalization.
A: Jonathan Gray stated these partnerships are incremental, aiming to provide easier access to alternatives for a broader range of investors, including in the retirement space.
Q: Mike Brown from UBS asked about demand in the retail channel and how new perpetual products might scale.
A: Jonathan Gray and Michael Chae noted resilient demand despite market noise, with hedge fund products and multi-asset approaches offering significant runway for growth.
Capital markets and transaction fees
Q: Craig Siegenthaler from Bank of America asked about the evolution of the capital markets business and the long-term growth of transaction fees.
A: Jonathan Gray explained that transaction activity scales with the growth of AUM and the firm's platform, and they remain committed to a capital-light approach.
Real estate fundamentals
Q: Dan Fannon from Jefferies asked for more detail on real estate fundamentals in the current rate environment.
A: Jonathan Gray acknowledged cross-currents but highlighted that accelerating fundamentals in data centers and logistics, which represent over 60% of their exposure, support a recovery.
Q: Crispin Love from Piper Sandler asked about the trajectory of real estate management fees and what is needed for stabilization.
A: Michael Chae noted that real estate base management fees should remain broadly stable, with the recent fund termination of BREP 8 being a primary factor in recent sequential dynamics.
Insurance segment
Q: Daniel Welden from Wells Fargo asked about the competitive backdrop in the insurance segment and the fee rates of incremental mandates.
A: Jonathan Gray and Michael Chae stated that their independent model is a competitive advantage, with fee rates averaging 40 to 50 basis points.
Financial guidance and fee growth
Q: Bill Katz from TD Cowen asked about the opportunity in realizations and the drivers of double-digit base management fee growth.
A: Michael Chae said Q4 net realizations are expected to surpass Q3 levels, and double-digit fee growth is driven by new drawdown funds and perpetual strategy expansion.
Q: Brian Bedell from Deutsche Bank asked about the contribution of credit deployment to fee growth and the potential for margin scaling.
A: Michael Chae explained that growth is driven by drawdown funds and perpetual strategies, and the firm expects to see scalable operating leverage.
Q: Brennan Hawken from BMO Capital Markets asked if the low double-digit fee growth expectation includes catch-up fees and for the shape of the step-up.
A: Michael Chae clarified that the low double-digit growth refers to full-year base management fees, and Q4 will see a step-up in realizations.
Q: Ken Worthington from JPMorgan asked about the sales success in multi-asset strategies and the outlook for organic growth and fee rates.
A: Jonathan Gray and Michael Chae highlighted strong performance in BXMA and noted that fee rates are stabilizing as the business scales.
Q: Arnaud Giblat from BNP Paribas asked if there should be a set down in fees due to funds reaching the end of their investment periods.
A: Michael Chae noted that fund terminations are built into results, with the BREP 8 termination being the most notable recent development.
Q: Patrick Davitt from Autonomous Research asked about direct lending pipelines and whether spread improvements have continued.
A: Jonathan Gray noted that volatility slowed transaction activity, but credit health remains good and spreads have remained constant.

